<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" 
     xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
     xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
     xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 >
<channel>
	<title>PlugIM - All Seth's Stories</title>
	<link>http://www.plugim.com</link>
	
	<description>PlugIM</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:50:10 -0500</pubDate>
	<generator>http://www.plugim.com</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Social Media Traffic Isn't Useless]]></title>
		<link>http://www.plugim.com/story/Social_Media_Traffic_Isnt_Useless/</link>
		<comments>http://www.plugim.com/story/Social_Media_Traffic_Isnt_Useless/</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 18:50:10 -0500</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<guid>http://www.plugim.com/story/Social_Media_Traffic_Isnt_Useless/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Many people are saying the traffic you get from the heavy weight social media sites is useless.  Well, they might not buy anything or click your ads, but Rand shows the long term benefits of making the front page. <a href='http://www.plugim.com/story/Social_Media_Traffic_Isnt_Useless/'>More...</a>]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Is Digg Just for Traffic?]]></title>
		<link>http://www.plugim.com/story/Is_Digg_Just_for_Traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.plugim.com/story/Is_Digg_Just_for_Traffic/</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 23:52:46 -0500</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<category>marketing</category>
		<guid>http://www.plugim.com/story/Is_Digg_Just_for_Traffic/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["A smart way to use digg traffic and how a regular use of it can help you gain tremendous results" <a href='http://www.plugim.com/story/Is_Digg_Just_for_Traffic/'>More...</a>]]></description>
	</item>

	<item>
		<title><![CDATA[Google's New Algorithm to Rank Pages and Detect Spam: PhraseRank?]]></title>
		<link>http://www.plugim.com/story/Googles_New_Algorithm_to_Rank_Pages_and_Detect_Spam_PhraseRank/</link>
		<comments>http://www.plugim.com/story/Googles_New_Algorithm_to_Rank_Pages_and_Detect_Spam_PhraseRank/</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 23:29:40 -0500</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<category>search_engines</category>
		<guid>http://www.plugim.com/story/Googles_New_Algorithm_to_Rank_Pages_and_Detect_Spam_PhraseRank/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["The new indexing and ranking system proposed by Google uses page content (phrases) to rank search results in a way that is highly immune to manipulation attempts. The properties of a web document used to rank documents, i.e. phrases and relations between them, are influenced by the properties of all the other documents in the index, and therefore are out of control of webmasters." <a href='http://www.plugim.com/story/Googles_New_Algorithm_to_Rank_Pages_and_Detect_Spam_PhraseRank/'>More...</a>]]></description>
	</item>

</channel>
</rss>
